Published November 19, 2025

On October 6, 2025, the UCLA Voting Rights Project (VRP), directed by Dr. Matt A. Barreto and Chad W. Dunn, JD, in the Luskin School of Public Affairs, successfully argued in favor of Hispanic and Black voters in League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) et al. v. Abbott,

VPR’s legal director, Dunn, and senior staff attorney, Sonni Waknin, represented Hispanic and Black voters across Texas, alleging that the congressional map was intentionally discriminatory and drawn to dismantle existing Hispanic opportunity districts in Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, Central Texas, and the Gulf Coast area, and Black voters in the Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston areas.

VRP’s faculty director, Dr. Barreto, testified as an expert witness on behalf of the Brooks and MALC plaintiffs and individual voters, teaming up with VRP senior data scientist Michael Rios to author two expert reports and a rebuttal report submitted as evidence to the Court. The Barreto and Rios reports provided critical statistical evidence that the 2025 Texas congressional map used racial targets when drawing district boundaries and the Federal Court credited the Barreto-Rios reports as credible and relied on their data analysis in striking down the Texas map.

The decision marks a victory for voting rights advocates who have argued the map was drawn “focusing on race,” fragmenting and concentrating underrepresented communities to weaken their political influence. In doing so, the Court found that the Texas legislature and government acted with intentional discrimination against Black and Hispanic voters.

The 2025 map attempted to dismantle four majority-minority districts that elect Hispanic and Black members of Congress, and the Federal Court has ruled that it was unconstitutional.

Contributors: Chad Dunn, Matt Barreto, Sonni Waknin, Michael Rios

With UCLA Voting Rights Project assistance, Latino voters have succeeded on their Washington Voting Rights Act claim and Franklin County Commission seats will be elected in single-member districts.

The UCLA Voting Rights Project (VRP), representing three individual Latino voters and the League of United Latino America Citizens (LULAC), succeeded in demonstrating that Franklin County, Washington was in violation of the Washington Voting Rights Act (WVRA). This order comes after the UCLA VRP sent a notice letter in October 2020 and filed a lawsuit in April 2021. In finding a violation of the WVRA, the Court determined that Latinos in Franklin County had an unequal opportunity to elect candidates of choice in violation of the law. Latinos have never elected a candidate of choice to the Franklin County Commission under the at-large system.

According to the Court’s order, Franklin County Commissioner elections will switch to single-member districts and the County will have until November 8, 2021 to propose a single-member district map. The UCLA Voting Rights project will continue to ensure that any map adopted will not dilute the Latino community.

Plaintiff Gabriel Portugal said, “We are truly pleased about Monday’s court hearing outcome. The Court ruled in our favor that the Franklin County Commissioners are indeed in violation of the law. Now the County’s election system will be changed. Many voters including Latinos in Franklin County now have the right to elect a candidate within their district. This right is an essential part of our democracy. We believe this is a win for everyone in Franklin County.”

“We are proud to have represented our Plaintiffs and look forward to working with our Plaintiffs and members of the Latino community in Franklin County to ensure that these single-member districts are fair,” stated Sonni Waknin, Managing Attorney and Voting Rights Counsel.

Contributors: Sonni WakninChad DunnVivian AlejandreMichael Rios & Tye Rush


Trial Court Documents

Conformed Amended Complaint for Injunctive Relief Under the WVRA- 5/5/2021

Defendants’ Answer to Complaint for Injunctive Relief Under the Washington Voting Rights Act- 5/12/2021

Plfs’ Second Motion for Partial MSJ Exhibits- 3/21/2022

Plfs’ Second Motion for Partial Summary Judgment- 3/21/2022

Order Approving Settlement – conformed – 5/09/2022


Washington Supreme Court

Opening Brief – 7/28/2022

Brief of Respondents- 9/12/2022

Reply Brief of Appellant- 12/22/2022

Brief of Amicus Curiae Brennan Ctr for Justice ISO Plaintiffs-Respondents- 3/27/2023

Brief of Law School Clinics Focused on Civil Rights as Amici Curiae- 3/27/2023

Amicus Brief of State of Washington- 4/03/2023

OneAmerica and CLC Amici Curiae Brief- 4/03/2023

Slip Opinion- 6/15/2024


U.S. Supreme Court

Gimenez Petition Final- 11/07/2023

Gimenez PFC Appendix- 11/07/2023

Portugal Respondents’ Waiver of Right to Respond- 11/28/2023

Amicus Brief Project on Fair Representation- 12/13/2023

Court Letter Requiring Response from Portugal Respondents- 12/28/2023

Respondents Letter Requesting Extension to File Response- 1/12/2024

Brief in Opposition Final- 2/28/2024

Gimenez Reply Brief Final- 3/13/2024

SCOTUS Letter Denying Gimenez Writ of Certiorari- 4/01/2024

Published July 18, 2022

On July 18, 2022, UCLA Voting Rights Project (VRP) filed an amicus brief on behalf of UCLA Social Scientists with the U.S. Supreme Court in the voting rights case Merrill et. al., v. Milligan et. al. The VRP argued for the Court to keep the Voting Rights Act’s longstanding protections of minority voting rights intact.

The VRP’s amicus brief focused on three main points. First, that race still plays a significant role in elections. VRP cites social science articles regarding racially polarized voting analysis and the role it plays in demonstrating racial bias and animus in voting. In this section VRP notes the link racial bias has to the supposedly race neutral redistricting factor of partisanship. Second, VRP argues that VRA section 2b (specifically the Gingles standards laid out by the Supreme Court in Thornburg v. Gingles) protections remain necessary to protect voters in local governments. To support, VRP highlights the persistence of at-large voting systems in local elections (school boards, city councils, etc). VRP also discusses the exacting standards imposed by Gingles that already make a successful Section 2 violation difficult for plaintiffs to prove.  Lastly, VRP argues that non-discriminatory voting systems benefit minority groups, emphasizing the link between racial bias and policy outcomes for minority communities. VRP cites social science highlighting the stark difference in policy outcomes when there is significant minority representation versus when there is not.

Background of Merrill et.al., v. Milligan et.al: Three separate sets of Plaintiffs challenged Alabama’s 2021 congressional district maps alleging constitutional and VRA violations. Specifically, Plaintiffs alleged that the black community was “packed” into Congressional District 7, “cracking” the remaining black community among other districts. This prevented the drawing of a second majority black district in the state in violation of the VRA. After a three-judge district court issued an injunction on the Alabama’s map and ordered the drawing of a new map, the Supreme Court granted Alabama’s request for a stay.


Read the amicus brief here:

A federal judge found that Galveston County’s 2021 redistricting plan diluted the voting strength of Black and Latino voters, violating Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

The UCLA Voting Rights Project (UCLA VRP), along with co-counsels Neil G. Baron and the Campaign Legal Center, representing three Galveston residents, the Honorable Terry Petteway, Honorable Penny Pope and Honorable Derrick Rose, filed the challenge to Galveston County’s 2021 redistricting plans claiming that they were racially discriminatory in intent and impact. The U.S. Department of Justice and local chapters of NAACP and LULAC filed parallel litigation, which was consolidated into the current case. This suit followed a prior lawsuit filed in 2013 by Petteway, Pope and Rose challenging Galveston County’s Justice of the Peace and Constable districts.

Read the Court Order here and the Findings of Facts here.

“Today’s decision recognizes and rectifies the discrimination and dilution of the voting strength of Black and Latino voters in Galveston County,” said Chad Dunn, Legal Director of UCLA VRP. “The court’s ruling underscores the fundamental principle that every citizen, regardless of race or background, deserves an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice in countywide offices. The decision also reaffirms the enduring power and relevance of the Voting Rights Act. It serves as a reminder that attempts to undermine the voices of minority communities, as witnessed in the 2021 redistricting in the county, will not go unchallenged or unnoticed.

Bernadette Reyes, counsel in the case and voting right counsel at UCLA VRP, added, “The implications of this decision extend beyond the borders of Galveston County. The ruling sends a clear message to jurisdictions nationwide: Redistricting efforts that marginalize minority communities, whether out of malice or negligence, violate the fundamental pillars of our democracy and will not be tolerated. UCLA VRP remains committed to ensuring that the letter of this ruling is fully implemented until Galveston County’s redistricting reflects the rich diversity and strength of its communities.”

UCLA Voting Rights Project is an advocacy project housed within the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs.

Contributors: Bernadette Reyes & Sonni Waknin

Plaintiffs’ Motion to File Supplemental Complaint- January 2018

Proposed First Amended Complaint – March 2022

Court Order – October 2023

FOCOLS from Court – October 2023

With UCLA Voting Rights Project assistance, Latino voters have succeeded on their Washington Voting Rights Act claim and Franklin County Commission seats will be elected in single-member districts.

The UCLA Voting Rights Project (VRP), representing three individual Latino voters and the League of United Latino America Citizens (LULAC), succeeded in demonstrating that Franklin County, Washington was in violation of the Washington Voting Rights Act (WVRA). This order comes after the UCLA VRP sent a notice letter in October 2020 and filed a lawsuit in April 2021. In finding a violation of the WVRA, the Court determined that Latinos in Franklin County had an unequal opportunity to elect candidates of choice in violation of the law. Latinos have never elected a candidate of choice to the Franklin County Commission under the at-large system. 

According to the Court’s order, Franklin County Commissioner elections will switch to single-member districts and the County will have until November 8, 2021 to propose a single-member district map. The UCLA Voting Rights project will continue to ensure that any map adopted will not dilute the Latino community. 

Plaintiff Gabriel Portugal said, “We are truly pleased about Monday’s court hearing outcome. The Court ruled in our favor that the Franklin County Commissioners are indeed in violation of the law. Now the County’s election system will be changed. Many voters including Latinos in Franklin County now have the right to elect a candidate within their district. This right is an essential part of our democracy. We believe this is a win for everyone in Franklin County.”

“We are proud to have represented our Plaintiffs and look forward to working with our Plaintiffs and members of the Latino community in Franklin County to ensure that these single-member districts are fair,” stated Sonni Waknin, Managing Attorney and Voting Rights Counsel. 

Contributors: Sonni Waknin, Chad Dunn, Vivian Alejandre, Michael Rios & Tye Rush